<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5902001554910776047.post1705095789290961280..comments</id><updated>2009-12-06T10:37:52.370Z</updated><category term='Claims'/><category term='Cars'/><category term='Kindle'/><category term='ROI'/><category term='Architecture'/><category term='RFEs'/><category term='Standards'/><category term='Backup/Recovery'/><category term='Christmas'/><category term='Amazon'/><category term='NetApp'/><category term='EMC'/><category term='Hype'/><category term='Cisco'/><category term='NDA'/><category term='TCO'/><category term='Vendors'/><category term='Management'/><category term='Selling'/><category term='cloud'/><category term='Oracle'/><category term='Objects'/><category term='Grumpy'/><category term='OT'/><category term='Environment'/><category term='Supply chain'/><category term='Support'/><category term='SNW-Europe'/><category term='PR'/><category term='Conferences'/><category term='VMware'/><category term='Travel'/><category term='Snow'/><category term='SSD'/><category term='Dell'/><category term='Process'/><category term='StorageBeers'/><category term='Laptop'/><category term='Communication'/><category term='Rant'/><category term='RPQ'/><category term='Partners'/><category term='Storage'/><category term='Android'/><category term='LiveScribe'/><title type='text'>Comments on GrumpyStorage: Storage - LUN Sizing &amp; Standards</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.grumpystorage.com/feeds/1705095789290961280/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5902001554910776047/1705095789290961280/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.grumpystorage.com/2009/11/storage-lun-sizing-standards.html'/><author><name>ianhf</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/03223784099797393996</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='31' height='24' src='http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_wW2zwR1asiw/S69HA803kOI/AAAAAAAAADo/zGcmqvlIjlY/S220/solittlesay-sml.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>1</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5902001554910776047.post-6438772142493869697</id><published>2009-12-06T10:37:52.370Z</published><updated>2009-12-06T10:37:52.370Z</updated><title type='text'>Ian, we have standards at present and often they g...</title><content type='html'>Ian, we have standards at present and often they get in the way of working in the most efficient manner. I agree with you that this will become less important as the technologies change. I can see a time when we allocate data-space to a service with perhaps high and low water-marks as guidance allowing the array/devices to provision/allocate/deallocate on demand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Certainly as we move to arrays which move blocks around according to access profiles, the allocation of LUNs becomes an archiac concept. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As I have said numerous times, this all feels a bit like moving back into the world of the mainframe. Not a bad thing really as long as the processes put in move faster than glacial.</content><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5902001554910776047/1705095789290961280/comments/default/6438772142493869697'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5902001554910776047/1705095789290961280/comments/default/6438772142493869697'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://www.grumpystorage.com/2009/11/storage-lun-sizing-standards.html?showComment=1260095872370#c6438772142493869697' title=''/><author><name>6p010534b1c8f7970b</name><uri>http://profile.typepad.com/6p010534b1c8f7970b</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/openid16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://www.grumpystorage.com/2009/11/storage-lun-sizing-standards.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5902001554910776047.post-1705095789290961280' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/5902001554910776047/posts/default/1705095789290961280' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-73504336'/></entry></feed>
